Read the paragraph. by the end of the 1800s, there was a change in the nature of the immigrants coming to the united states. immigration from northern europe—england, ireland, germany, and scandinavia—declined, while immigration from italy, russia, and austria-hungary grew. in fact, between 1900 and 1910, more than three-fourths of all immigrants came from these three countries. unfortunately, these countries were far removed england, the home of our founders, and the immigrants who came from them had a hard time adjusting to life in their new country. which of the following best summarizes this paragraph objectively? these new immigrants were not like the ones that built our great country. most of the newcomers came from southern and eastern europe. unlike earlier immigrants, who came from northern and western europe, the new immigrants of the late 1800s and early 1900s came mostly from southern and eastern europe. the new immigrants of the late 1800s and early 1900s came mostly from southern and eastern europe, so they could not fit in with americans. the founders of america came from england, but later immigrants came from other european countries and therefore did not belong in the united states.

The right answer is option A. Objectively speaking, the paragraph in question talks about both the eastern european origins of inmigrants coming into the U.S.A during the late 1800s and early 1900s, and the hardship these encountered to adjust in their new country as opposed to former English settlers.

In this respect, option B, though a good partial summary of the paragraph, does not paraphrase it appropiately. Options D and C go slightly off topic as they misrepresents the idea of difficult adaptation.

Therefore, the only possible answer is A.

The correct answer is B: "Unlike earlier immigrants, who came from northern and western Europe, the new immigrants of the late 1800s and early 1900s came mostly from southern and eastern Europe."

Explanation:

The rest of the answer choices have subjective language like "our great country" (A), "could not fit in" (C), and "did not belong" (D). Answer choice B is the only objective summary of the passage.

Plus, it's right on edge. B is your answer.

уєѕ нє ℓσѕт ¢σитяσℓ σf нιѕ ρυριℓѕ

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.