subject
Social Studies, 12.07.2019 16:40 corynanderson16

Which was a major achievement of both the knights of labor and the american federation of labor during the late 1800s and early 1900s? a. an end to labor strikes across the country b. the expansion of the labor force to include immigrants c. the reduction of the workday from ten to eight hours d. the hiring of skilled labor in factories

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30
He chart shows the 112th u.s. congress (2011–2012). based on the information in the chart, if the independents in the senate chose to vote with the republicans in the senate, the republicans would
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Interest groups and political action committees are both types of organizations that
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
How do comedies differ from tragedies
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which was a major achievement of both the knights of labor and the american federation of labor duri...
Questions
question
Spanish, 30.06.2019 23:20
Questions on the website: 13722363