When the variable religious affiliation is classified as protestant, catholic, and jewish, this variable has the important quality of being?

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Question 18 multiple choice worth 3 points) (american money lo 4 hc) suppose the federal reserve raises interest rates. which of the following predicts the most likely results? the money supply will decrease, meaning that banks will give fewer loans and prices for goods and services will fall. the money supply will decrease, meaning that more people will buy goods and services and prices will rise, the money supply will increase, meaning that banks will give more loans and more businesses can open and hire workers. the money supply will increase, meaning that prices will rise and businesses will not hire many workers. i will mark the brainliest

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy