Which of the following best explains why people do not have unlimited first amendment rights? it is inappropriate to criticize or condemn elected government officials. leaders worth following would be drowned out by meaningless speech. certain types of speech could infringe on others' rights or public safety. the government would be ineffective, weighed down by citizen requests.

The answer is C.  Certain types of speech could infringe on other's rights or public safety, for example under First Amendment there is not any protection for Obscenity.  Also Defamation, Falsifying military awards, Confidential information, hate speech, sedition speech etc. Some can harm people's reputation and some can be simply offensive, others can threat the country's security.

they can increase to boost the enonomy.

barack obama

i love this guy