An inmate in a state prison claims his united states constitutional rights prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment are being violated by the state correctional facility. this case: a) a. may not be decided by a federal court since it involves a state facility. b) b. must be decided by the state court where the inmate established residency before going to prison. c) c. cannot be heard, as prisoners lose the right to sue d) d. is a federal question case over which the federal courts have jurisdiction.

Which type of evidence would support the author's claim?

Acriterion for waiving informed consent is that, when appropriate, subjects are provided additional pertinent information after the study. in which of the following studies would it not be appropriate to provide subjects with information about missing elements of consent: a study in which researchers told students that they would be given a quiz after reading some study materials when the researchers did not intend to use a quiz, but were attempting to focus subjects’ attention on the material.a study in which subjects were told that they performed in the third quartile on an anagram task when in reality students were randomly assigned scores that were not related to their actual performance.a study in which subjects were assigned to study activities based on an undesirable or unflattering physical characteristic as assessed by members of the research team.a study involving decision-making games in which subjects were led to believe that they were interacting with another student in another room, but were actually interacting with a computer programmed to provide consistent responses to all subjects.

During the course of a raid, communication between swat team members suffered as excessive static overwhelmed radios. within the communication process, this static can be viewed as it interfered with the communication.