subject
Social Studies, 31.07.2019 14:30 harodkdc8463

Which is not a good practice in conducting interviews? a. be happy – happy people radiate confidence b. explain thoroughly – it is estimated that in a strong interview session, the interviewer (you) should talk and explain about 60% of the time; and the interviewee should answer about 40% of the time c. if the interviewee ask you a question, answer it truthfully – and if you don't know an answer, say so d. pay attention to what the interviewee is saying e. watch interviewees' facial expressions, how they sit and their body language; do they cross their arms; do they lean forward?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Why do you think kush in nubia is not as well-known as egypt? ( me with my exit ticket)
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20
Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the a—b design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the a—b design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that won’t have much impact in a single case design.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:30
The defendant, angered because a rival gang member had twice beaten him up after school, obtained a heavy lead pipe and waited in a deserted alleyway which he knew the rival took as a route home every day after school. when his enemy came walking down the alley, the defendant leapt out behind him and smashed the pipe into the victim's head, knocking him to the ground. the defendant then rolled the victim over and pounded his face with 15 to 20 heavy blows with the lead pipe, killing him. the jurisdiction defines first degree murder as murder committed with premeditation and deliberation. all other murders are defined as second degree murders. why will the defendant be convicted of first degree murder (as opposed to second degree murder)?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:50
Suppose that a father is walking his young daughter to school when a driver of an automobile negligently runs off the road and onto the sidewalk, hitting the girl but not her father. the young girl dies from her injuries. the father suffers severe emotional distress by seeing his daughter die and manifests his distress by suffering physically. which of the following is an accurate statement regarding the father's right to sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile? a. the father can sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile for intentional infliction of emotional distress for the severe distress he suffered by seeing his daughter die. b. the father cannot sue the driver since tort law does not recognize strict liability for automobile accidents. c. the father cannot sue the driver since the driver did not intend to cause harm. d. the father can sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile for negligent infliction of emotional distress for the severe distress he suffered by seeing his daughter die. e. the father cannot sue the driver since he did not suffer physical injury himself.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which is not a good practice in conducting interviews? a. be happy – happy people radiate confidenc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.07.2019 13:00
question
Computers and Technology, 25.07.2019 13:00
Questions on the website: 13722359