subject
Social Studies, 31.07.2019 02:30 jeisleen6808

In an experiment, a bunch of bananas was placed just beyond a chimpanzee's reach. boxes and sticks were left in its housing area. after trying various ways of getting the bananas, the chimps seemed to give up, and then return in a while with an idea that worked. they were demonstrating

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which institution includes radio televisions and movies
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
Marcy tests a solution with a strip of blue litmus paper. the paper turns red. the solution is acidic basic neutral
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In an experiment, a bunch of bananas was placed just beyond a chimpanzee's reach. boxes and sticks w...
Questions
question
Physics, 29.07.2021 18:20
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2021 18:20
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2021 18:20
Questions on the website: 13722367