Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the french revolution. he notes that, following the revolution, a rash of violence swept over france. he refers to the execution of french royalty and the european wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument. in his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. based on this information, he argues that the french revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones. which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?

answer; the population in brazil is very diverse there are many races and ethnic groups

the arab empire adopted the muslim religion as their main belief. arabs would influence the people from the territories they invaded towards islam (the muslim belief).

nevertheless, throughout the history of the arab empire, rulers brought intellectual individuals from other religions to their centers of learning. these other foreigners included jews, christians, greeks, persians, and indians.   these resulted in the adoption of important knowledge developed by these cultures by the arabic empire. for example, the works of aristotle were translated from greek to arab and indian scientists brought the numerical concept of "zero" to the arabs.

nowadays, 93% of the arab population is muslim, which at the same time is subdivided in sects including the sunni, zaini, alawi, shia. the remaining 7% is composed mainly of christians.