subject
Social Studies, 29.07.2019 17:00 asdfghhk9805

Why does the marketplace of ideas often have a moderating effect on people's opinions? a. those who shop in the marketplace of ideas typically start with moderate viewpoints. b. moderate ideas are always closest to the truth and, therefore, are most successful in the marketplace of ideas. c. given constant exposure to other people's ideas, it is almost impossible for one not to modify one's own viewpoints. d. moderate ideas usually have the best financial backing and the greatest publicity. e. the most popular ideas are usually the most moderate ones?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Explain how tectonic plate movement creates geological events and features.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:50
In what ways are some local executive branches structured in a similar manner to state executive branches, and in what ways are some structured differently?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
When and why were fingerprints first used in the united states
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why does the marketplace of ideas often have a moderating effect on people's opinions? a. those who...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2020 05:20
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2020 05:20
question
Social Studies, 02.11.2020 05:20
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2020 05:20
question
Chemistry, 02.11.2020 05:30
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2020 05:30
Questions on the website: 13722361