Critically analyze the false starts in moral philosophy including relativism and divine command.

The principal issue that is the ethical theory that incorporates relativism and Divine Order are not credited in rationality. Individuals, who trust that they are proficient in ethnics, with no foundation in morals, are the ones that began this false moral in rationality. One of the disadvantages from cultural relativism is that you can't gain ground in light of the fact that the culture is correct all the times. Gatherings, for example, ISIS and other extremist religious organizations and groups are a case of cultural relativism. In Divine Command it expresses that the best thing that we should do is tuning in to what our gods or god lets us know no ifs ands or buts in the event that we do things that are ideal for us. Where this turns out badly is that on the off chance that you are in ISIS for instance and you trust it is on the right track to execute guiltless individuals since you think it is ideal for you and you say your god charges it that is exceptionally shameless and insensitive

Relativism attests that there's no absolute answer when divine command believes on the contrary approach, and God or gods guide your choices, destiny, and life. However, like everything, these ideas have their problems. When you relativize everything you can't find an answer and is always walking in circles. On the other hand, the divine command doesn't give you the possibility to contest your destiny or everything else.

Explanation:

i believe the answer is: returns on investments, no wages

people who belong in upper class society would most likely get there by obtaining multiple source of income, which a certain percentage of ownership for businesses. since most of them are job creator, they would most likely get their money from profit, not wages.