How might the decision in mcculloch v. maryland make future supreme court decisions more complicated?

a) the principle of federal supremacy meant the court would more often rule in favor of federal powers over those of individual states.

b) the principle of implied powers meant the court could rule based on what it felt was right rather than basing its decisions on the constitution.

c) the principle of implied powers meant the court might spend more time interpreting the constitution rather than simply following it to the letter.

d) the principle of federal supremacy meant the court would have to determine new limits on the federal government’s power.

The principle of the federal supremacy meant the Court would more often rule in favor of federal powers over those of individual states.

Explanation:

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ordered that Congress had proposed powers supporting the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to form the Second Bank of the U.S and that the state of Maryland needed the ability to charge the Bank. The “Necessary and Proper” Clause granted Congress the authority to build a national bank.

The principle of the federal supremacy meant the Court would more often rule in favor of federal powers over those of individual states.

Explanation:

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ordered that Congress had proposed powers supporting the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to form the Second Bank of the U.S and that the state of Maryland needed the ability to charge the Bank. The “Necessary and Proper” Clause granted Congress the authority to build a national bank.

The correct option is (c) the principle of implied powers meant the Court might spend more time interpreting the Constitution rather than simply following it to the letter.

Further explanation:

In the Supreme Court, McCulloch s Maryland case took place in 1819, the court gave the decision in ‘favor of Congress’ stated that congress has ‘implied power’ under Necessary and proper clause of Article1 of section 8 that grant creating ‘Second Bank in U.S’ which Maryland lack earlier.  The situation concerned the correctness of “National bank” and tax imposed by the ‘State government’ of Maryland. The case stated implied powers of the U.S Federal Government stated in the ‘Constitution’ under the “Necessary and Proper” clause and provide congress authority to the organization a Federal Bank. The ‘decision of authorizing’ congress to found the bank was commended by ‘Chief Justice Marshall’ with four opinions.  

Learn more:

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Topic: McCulloch vs. Maryland Case

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords: principle, decision, implied powers, state government, federal bank, chief justice, Congress

The correct option is (c) the principle of implied powers meant the Court might spend more time interpreting the Constitution rather than simply following it to the letter.

Further explanation:

In the Supreme Court, McCulloch s Maryland case took place in 1819, the court gave the decision in ‘favor of Congress’ stated that congress has ‘implied power’ under Necessary and proper clause of Article1 of section 8 that grant creating ‘Second Bank in U.S’ which Maryland lack earlier.  The situation concerned the correctness of “National bank” and tax imposed by the ‘State government’ of Maryland. The case stated implied powers of the U.S Federal Government stated in the ‘Constitution’ under the “Necessary and Proper” clause and provide congress authority to the organization a Federal Bank. The ‘decision of authorizing’ congress to found the bank was commended by ‘Chief Justice Marshall’ with four opinions.  

Learn more:

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Topic: McCulloch vs. Maryland Case

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords: principle, decision, implied powers, state government, federal bank, chief justice, Congress

answer; /// (culture);

should congress have the power to interpret the constitution? write a paragraph in which you argue for or against the wide application of the limplied power