Environmental impact statements outline the
a. environmental effects of proposed industry actions
b. environmental effects of proposed government agency actions
c. environmental effects of entities in the private sector
d. environmental effects of government and 4 actions

Aims to predict environmental impacts at an early stage in project planning and design, find ways and means to reduce adverse impacts, shape projects to suit the local environment and present the predictions and options to decision-makers. By using EIA both environmental and economic benefits can be achieved, such as reduced cost and time of project implementation and design, avoided treatment/clean-up costs and impacts of laws and regulations. Although legislation and practice vary around the world, the fundamental components of an EIA would necessarily involve the following stages: a.   Screening to determine which projects or developments require a full or partial impact assessment study; b.   Scoping to identify which potential impacts are relevant to assess (based on legislative requirements, international conventions, expert knowledge and public involvement), to identify alternative solutions that avoid, mitigate or compensate adverse impacts on biodiversity (including the option of not proceeding with the development, finding alternative designs or sites which avoid the impacts, incorporating safeguards in the design of the project, or providing compensation for adverse impacts), and finally to derive terms of reference for the impact assessment; c.   Assessment and evaluation of impacts and development of alternatives, to predict and identify the likely environmental impacts of a proposed project or development, including the detailed elaboration of alternatives; d.   Reporting the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or EIA report, including an environmental management plan (EMP), and a non-technical summary for the general audience. e.   Review of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), based on the terms of reference (scoping) and public (including authority) participation. f.     Decision-making on whether to approve the project or not, and under what conditions; and g.   Monitoring, compliance, enforcement and environmental auditing. Monitor whether the predicted impacts and proposed mitigation measures occur as defined in the EMP. Verify the compliance of proponent with the EMP, to ensure that unpredicted impacts or failed mitigation measures are identified and addressed in a timely fashion.  

The correct answer is: their civil liberties have been protected, but their civil rights are less clear apex. hope this .