Do you think that urban renewal was an effective approach to the housing problem in inner cities?

Think about this:
-Goals of the National Housing Act of 1949
-the claims made by some critics of urban renewal
-the resident's best interest

Effective—The ultimate goal was to construct affordable housing for the poor, and it did tear down many bad areas and put up new housing.
Ineffective—It did not provide enough new housing and displaced many poor people when old housing was torn down.

Well the french and indian war took place around 1754-1763 also they were pitted the colonies of british america against those of new france, each side supported by military units from the parent country by american indian it was a seven years war, but it ended with the treaty of paris in main point is that the british wanted to settle in the ohio river valley and to trade with native americans who lived there,so the french built forts to protect their trade with the indians,also in 1754, george washington led an army against the french! can finish it off(hope that (: