subject
Social Studies, 24.07.2019 12:30 james8781

Dr. jameson wanted to know if intelligence quotient (iq) scores differed between male and female participants in his study. he gave 28 participants an iq test and then compared iq scores for gender differences. he hypothesized that there would be a statistically significant gender difference in iq scores. contrary to dr. jameson's hypothesis, there were no differences in iq scores between men and women in his study. which test was dr. jameson most likely to use to test his hypothesis?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the than freud had allowed.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00
The government has the right to restrict the number of people who visit the white house. this is an example of a government exercising its
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10
Rational ignorance suggests that a. voters are ignorant on issues that are not of special interest to them b. voters do not pursue information about issues before voting c. low voter turnout is due to a lack of understanding of the platforms of each political party d. voters are uninterested in the electoral process
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Dr. jameson wanted to know if intelligence quotient (iq) scores differed between male and female par...
Questions
question
English, 25.01.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 03:10
question
English, 25.01.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 03:10
Questions on the website: 13722367