subject
Social Studies, 22.07.2019 12:00 squawk1738

Psychologist alan marlatt and colleagues have argued that a more credible approach to college drinking than abstinence programs is to recognize drinking as normative behavior and focus education on the immediate risks of drinking to excess and the payoffs of moderation. this is an example of the:

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30
What is grievance 28 on the declaration of independence explained in simpler words? plz
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Emma lives on a tight budget. she saves money and also makes intelligent choices when spending it. which statements describe emma's financial skills? select three options.emma is more prepared to meet her basic needs.emma is better prepared to avoid financial setbacks.emma is better able to avoid accumulating assets.emma is more prepared to face emergencies.emma is better able to avoid financial decision-making.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:10
Advances in technology generally result a.) a higher standard of living for everyone b.) greater productivity c.) more jobs for everyone d.) more government regulation
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Psychologist alan marlatt and colleagues have argued that a more credible approach to college drinki...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.04.2021 04:30
question
Social Studies, 23.04.2021 04:30
question
English, 23.04.2021 04:30
Questions on the website: 13722361