Social Studies, 22.07.2019 00:32 HecptyAura

Read this claim: representative democracy is better at representing the views of citizens than direct democracy. which statement about the claim is true? a. it is both arguable and defensible. b. it is defensible but not arguable. c. it is arguable but not defensible. d. it is neither arguable nor defensible.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30

What is the rule relating the ratio of marginal utility to prices of two goods at the optimal choice? explain why, if this rule does not hold, the choice cannot be utility-maximizing.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:00

Can someone me with these 2 questions? and tell me why it is the correct answer?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Read this claim: representative democracy is better at representing the views of citizens than dire...

Questions