Discuss the relevance of pholosophy in critical thinking

The philosophy of science, as a reflection on the nature of the scientific knowledge, is a domain of studies with particular relevance to critical thinking, which is fundamental both in the scientific practice and in the public reception of the scientific work. The present paper aims to demonstrate this relevance in four domains. First, by highlighting epistemological problems present at the level of the confirmation and refutation of empirical hypotheses. Second, by analyzing the concept of causality and some of the main critical questions that are associated with the exercise of causal reasoning. Third, and at level of the distinction between science and pseudoscience, by presenting typical characteristics of pseudoscience that can serve as a guide to judge the credibility of putative scientific studies. Lastly, by evaluating the extent to which science can be influenced by non-epistemic (social, moral or political) values and by proposing means to control the action of these values in science. One may conclude that the contribution of philosophy of science strengthens the educational benefits of training in critical thinking, both at the level of a scientific education and a general education.

Explanation:

1. a

2. b

3. d

4. d

5. b

6. b

7.b

8. a

9. d

10. d

it can be both; depending on the situation at hand.

explanation:

let's just say i get in to a confrontation with someone, and they say "ur mom", it could be seen as an insult. or depending on the relationship or comfortability with the person it may be seen as a joke. the distinct line is how the chemistry behind the confrontation.