Which of the following represents organisms in a food chain?

a hawks, owls, eagles
b deer, rabbits, cows
c seeds, mice, snakes
d hyenas, vultures, crows

c seeds, mice, snakes

Explanation:

a hawks, owls, eagles NO

These animals all eat some form of meat, and they are on the top of all of their food chains. If you put these animals in a room with no food, there'd be no food chain, and they would got out at each other until there was one left, and there'd be no advatanges because 1. they can all fly and 2. they are all top consumers. The same thing goes for D except hyenas can't fly.

b deer, rabbits, cows NO

This is not a food chain because all of the animals are herbivore, so they only eats plants and will not eat each other.

c seeds, mice, snakes YES

The seeds are a producer which is to be eaten by a consumer (the mouse), and which are then eaten by the predator, the snake.

d hyenas, vultures, crows NO

Hope this helps, now you know the answer and how to do it. HAVE A BLESSED AND WONDERFUL DAY! As well as a great Valentines Day! :-)  

- Cutiepatutie ☺❀❤

blah

explanation:

bc blah

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."