a group of environmentalists was discussing the benefits and drawbacks associated with using fossil fuels. which argument best fits the conversation.

The question is incomplete as it lacks the apropriate options. However, the options are as follows:

1. Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

2. Fossil fuel reserves will never be depleted.

3. Fossil fuels are easily renewed.

4. Fossil fuel use does not affect the environment.

Option 1.  Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

Explanation:

Fossil fuels are made by the natural procedure in a more extended time frame, for example, anaerobic decay of the dead living resembling plants, and creatures. These plants and creature's decayed naturally to pilled up to frame coal, or common gases or raw petroleum.  

By the utilization of these fuels, the stores are constantly exhausting and as it can not be recharged it will not present in the future. Non-renewable energy sources expand the greenhouse gases in condition and influence it by increasing carbon in climate. Be that as it may, these energizes are less expensive in comparison to different fuels.  

Therefore, the right answer is - Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

you can't see the options

1. a host loses nutrients to a parasite

2. a parasite only benefits when the host is alive (cause if the host dies the parasite dies with it )

3. producers to consumers

4. the tapeworm is a parasite

5. they convert energy from the sun (photosynthesis)

6. sunflower-robin (i think im 80% sure)

7. producer

8. consumer

9. prey

10. fresh water snails ( cause the green algea is the producer and the snails are the primary consumers and the small fish consumer so is the big fish)