Question- Compare the costs of using renewable resources to the costs of using nonrenewable resources.
sample response-
The costs of using both renewable and nonrenewable resources depend on the extent of the use. If renewable resources are managed wisely, the use of the resource will not exceed the rate at which it is replenished. In this instance the cost of using renewable resources can be minimized, if not entirely eliminated. The cost of using nonrenewable resources is harder to minimize because nonrenewable resources cannot be replenished at the rate at which they are used. The environmental impact of using nonrenewable resources such as fossil fuels is greater than just the loss of the resource itself. Other impacts such as acid rain, global warming, and atmospheric pollution can result from the use of nonrenewable resources.
Summary in own words-
The amount of uses determines the cost of renewable resources as well as nonrenewable. If handled sensibly, renewable resources won't outplace the restoration rate. The cost associated with renewable resources would be minimized or even completely cut out whereas the cost of nonrenewable resources is more difficult to reduce because they are not restored as fast. Not only is there a loss of resources when using nonrenewable resources there is also a negative effect on the environment such as global warming.
(I don't know how good it is but I didn't see any answers besides the exact answer so for all my people out there that don't wanna reword it here you go and have a nice day u got this)