In 2009, Democratic President Barack Obama called on Congress to pass comprehensive health care reform. The goal of the legislation was to expand access to health insurance to the more than 40 million uninsured Americans and lower the overall cost of health care. The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives considered many different reforms, including a government-sponsored health plan with a public option and a requirement that all individuals purchase health care known as an individual mandate. Republicans opposed both ideas and put forth their own plans which included tax incentives and methods to lower costs when seeing a doctor. In the end, a bill called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed, which included an individual mandate but not a public option. The final vote in the House was 220-215. Only one Republican supported the bill, while 39 Democrats voted against it.

Republicans immediately began campaigning on a platform of repealing the ACA. After regaining control of the House of Representatives in the 2010 elections, the Republicans passed over 60 bills repealing the ACA. Each time, the legislation stalled in the Democratic-controlled Senate. When Republicans became the majority in both chambers following the 2014 elections, they finally passed a repeal of the Affordable Care Act. That legislation was vetoed by President Obama.

After reading the scenario, please respond to A, B, and C below.

a. Referencing the scenario, describe the party control of government when Congress passed legislation in 2014 to repeal the ACA, and explain how that party control could have affected the attempt to repeal the ACA in 2014.
b. Referencing the scenario, explain why a Republican representative following the delegate model of representation might have cast a vote in favor of the ACA bill in 2009 when it was originally passed.
c. Describe how the judicial branch could be used to implement the Republican’s legislative goals despite President Obama’s veto. Explain how this use of the judicial branch might ultimately affect the success of the Affordable Care Act.

Congress is termed as the legislative party that focuses on the implementation of the law and framing of the laws for the benefit of the general public and the citizens. The judiciary in congress is held as in charge of the interpretation and the formation of laws.

The answers to the above questions are:

a. The party of the government was the republicans when congress passed the legislation in the year 2014 for the laying of the appeal of ACA. This Republican control of Congress was the catalyst for the repeal of the ACA in 2014.

b. The Republican representative who cast a vote in favor of the ACA bill in 2009 followed strictly his constituency mandate.

c. When President Obama voted for the ACA repeal, the Republicans proceeded to court to use the judicial branch of government for the implementation of the legislative goals in the request of constitutional interpretation of the appealed bill.

To know more about the scenario of the congress, refer to the link below:

link

a. The party control of government when Congress passed legislation in 2014 to repeal the ACA was when Republicans gained majority seats in both chambers of Congress.  This Republican control of Congress was the catalyst for the repeal of the ACA in 2014.

b. The Republican representative who cast a vote in favor of the ACA bill in 2009 followed strictly his constituency mandate.

c. When President Obama vetoed the ACA repeal, the Republicans could proceed to court to try to use the judicial branch of government to implement their legislative goals by requesting for constitutional interpretation of the repealed bill.

If this had happened, it would have seriously hampered the implementation and success of the Affordable Care Act for partisan reasons.

Explanation:

a) Congress is the legislative arm of government that makes the law.  The executive implements the law.  The judiciary is in charge of the interpretation and application the law to real situations.  But when the President vetoes a bill, Congress can override the veto by ensuring that 2/3 of both chambers pass the law.  Alternatively, Congress can ask for a judicial interpretation.

answer; depth;