Michael, age 11, received a sled manufactured by Rosebud for Christmas. Since he already had a better sled, he sold the Rosebud to his neighbor Petey. Petey was riding the Rosebud sled down a hill when one of the bolts which held it together broke, causing the sled to overturn and injure Petey severely. The bolt broke because of a crack which existed when the sled left the factory, but which was too small to be discovered by reasonable inspection. If Petey sues Rosebud, who will likely win? a. Petey, if the cracked bolt was a defect
b. Petey, but only if Michael had not used the sled
c. Rosebud, since the original sale was not to Petey
d. Rosebud because the crack was too small to detect upon reasonable inspection.