From the information given below, compute the time in days for the following notes: Date of Note Due Date
Time in Days
1. June 28, 2010 August 10, 2010 days
2. March 5, 2010 August 12, 2010 days
3. April 20, 2010 July 17, 2010 days
4. January 12, 2010 May 15, 2010 days
5. December 17, 2010 February 2, 2011 days
From the information given below, determine the due date for the following notes:
Date of Note Time in Days/Months Due Date
6. February 14, 2010 45 days
7. March 13, 2010 60 days
8. May 15, 2010 3 months
9. November 15, 2010 30 days
10. October 27, 2010 120 days
From the information given below, calculate the accrued interest for the following notes (round to two decimal places, if necessary). Assume 360 days in a year.:
Principal Interest Rate Time Accrued Interest
11. $2,200 9.5% 45 days $
12. 2,500 12.5% 60 days $
13. 2,800 10.75% 90 days $
14. 3,300 8.9% 30 days $
15. 4,800 7.3% 120 days $

Savvy sightseeing had beginning equity of $90,000; revenues of $144,000, expenses of $83,000, and dividends to stockholders of $10,800. there were no stockholder investments during the year. calculate ending equity.

Colah company purchased $1.8 million of jackson, inc. 8% bonds at par on july 1, 2018, with interest paid semi-annually. when the bonds were acquired colah decided to elect the fair value option for accounting for its investment. at december 31, 2018, the jackson bonds had a fair value of $2.08 million. colah sold the jackson bonds on july 1, 2019 for $1,620,000. the purchase of the jackson bonds on july 1. interest revenue for the last half of 2018. any year-end 2018 adjusting entries. interest revenue for the first half of 2019. any entry or entries necessary upon sale of the jackson bonds on july 1, 2019. required: 1. prepare colah's journal entries for above transaction.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?