James and Bridget are receptionists. Often when they meet up for lunch, they end up discussing their respective jobs. Last week, James admitted that he accidentally forgot about a caller whom he had put on hold. Bridget reprimanded him and told him that a receptionist should never put callers on hold in the first place. Why is Bridget incorrect? Most callers prefer being put on hold as opposed to being required to call back later.

Putting a caller on hold allows a receptionist to do any research necessary to help the caller.

Bridget is correct—putting a caller on hold always results in missed opportunities for the company.

When a caller is put on hold, they get the positive impression that the company they are calling is busy and in high demand.

Which of the following is a disadvantage to choosing a sole proprietorship business structure? question 9 options: the owner has personal responsibility for the company's liabilities. the owner has to share the profits with partners. the owner is still liable for personal debts. the owner has to report to shareholders.

Keshawn used to work for an it company in baltimore, but lost his job when his company decided to use workers in new delhi instead. this is an example of:

Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?