In the first issue of the liberator, william lloyd garrison wrote: "i am in earnest – i will not equivocate – i will not excuse – i will not retreat a single inch – and i will be heard." describe how this reflects the time period in which he was writing. your answer should be at least 150 words. see below for the full excerpt. i am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for severity? i will be as harsh as truth, and as uncompromising as justice. on this subject i do not wish to think, or speak, or write, with moderation. no! no! tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately rescue his wife from the hands of the ravisher; tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it has fallen—but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. i am in earnest—i will not equivocate—i will not excuse—i will not retreat a single inch—and i will be heard. the apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead.

Taken from "The Liberator" by William Lloyd Garrison (1831), the excerpt "I am in earnest – I will not equivocate – I will not excuse – I will not retreat a single inch – and I will be heard" depicts the movement which the United States was going though. That movement was abolitionism. It took place in the late 18th and early 19th centuries and its purpose was to end the practice of slavery. William Lloyd Garrison joined the movement when he was 25 years old and he was the voice of abolitionism. In fact, Garrison helped organize the New England Anti-Slavery Society in 1832. Garrison published the first edition of the anti-slavery newspaper “The Liberator” in 1831 and he not only attacked slave-holders but also the gradualists; he focused on the emancipation of slaves in the country. Garrison’s publications reached thousands of individuals worldwide and most of the readers were African Americans. The last issue was published after the end of the Civil War in 1865.

the hunger games, written by  suzanne collins, is fiction in the young adult genre, which is not my age group, but i found myself unable to put it down. its combination of nerve-racking tension, thrilling action, and engaging love story kept me up until the wee hours. i was surprised at how completely engrossing the plot was. like  brave new world, this story is set in a future where the government oppresses its people, but the book also borrows ideas from the greek myth of theseus and the minotaur.

divided into 12 districts, ruled by an oppressive government located at the  capitol. katniss everdeen, a 16-year-old girl from district 12, takes her younger sister’s place as one of 24 “tributes” selected every year to participate in the hunger games at the capitol.

while i found this book absolutely enthralling, i was surprised it was aimed at an audience of young adults. it seems extremely intense for anyone younger than 16 or 17. for example, there is a scene where one young tribute is slowly eaten alive by wolf-like creatures all night long, and katniss has to finally throw a weapon at him to end his misery. i found this a little too disturbing when i considered the age of the character.

the intensity of the action was something one would find in a more mature book, but the age of the characters and the simplicity of the prose were aimed at a much younger audience. in addition, this book was written in present tense, which i found annoying, but that’s more of a personal preference than a stylistic fault. it was also edited somewhat poorly, but that rarely distracted from the plot. for example, the author often spoke in sentence fragments to describe how katniss felt, which might have been an attempt to reflect on her thought process, but i found it disorienting to read a lot of really short sentences all together. it would have been better to vary the sentence length on occasion, but the story was still coherently.

overall,  the hunger games  was an excellent, enthralling read that i highly recommend. if it was more clearly marked for older teens, it would have been better, but it was a fantastic book with a wonderfully creative plot.

happy to .

pls mark as brainliest.

answer: i am not sure but i think you should go for c

explanation: