Itz 25 pts ! plzz answer i promise i wil give you brainliest pl asap
1. which sentence best describes the employer in the original story "the ninny" and the
employer in the adaptation the governess?
(1 point)
the employer is a man in "the ninny" and a woman in the governess.
the employer is less emotional in "the ninny" than in the governess.
the employer is russian in "the ninny" and american in the governess.
the employer has two children in "the ninny" and only one in the governess.
2. how do both employers first cheat their governesses? (1 point)
the employers say they made a note of the fact that the pay is 30 rubles a month and not 40.
the employers indicate that an agreement was made about losing pay for holidays.
the employers decide to deduct rubles from the original amount because one of the children disobeyed.
the employers claim that their servant broke an expensive dish that had been in the family for a long
time.
3. how do yulia's protests in "the ninny" differ from julia's protests in the governess? (1 point)
julia does not object to what her employer is saying at all.
yulia objects more to what her employer is saying.
julia objects more to what her employer is saying.
yulia cries more as she objects to what her employer is saying.
4. after the governess says you in both selections, how are the reactions of the employers
similar?
(1 point)
they both ask the governess why she is a ninny.
they both ask the governess why she them.
they both ask if it is possible to easily cheat someone.
they both ask if the governess really wants her full pay.
5. which of the following is one way that “the ninny,” a short story, is different from the play
the governess?
(1 point)
yulia reluctantly counting the money is described in more detail.
yulia's actions of getting up to leave and then coming back to the desk are described.
the dialogue between yulia and her employer is more fully written out and more intense.
yulia's facial and emotional reactions to what her employer is doing are described.

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."