How does the identity of the dead enemy sniper affect our sniper’s perspective on the war?

right now after capturing the enemy sniper, the protagonist sniper feels severe remorse. The text specifically says remorse.

He have become bitten by way of regret.

remorse is a extraordinary phrase, because it encompasses some different feelings as properly. inside the definition of remorse is remorse and guilt. The sniper feels badly about killing his enemy. He regrets having to have killed another professional shooter, and feels responsible over the carnage that he has dedicated.

. . . he revolted from the sight of the shattered mass of his dead enemy. His tooth chattered, he started to gibber to himself, cursing the warfare, cursing himself, cursing anybody.

After the sniper pulls himself returned together, he decides that he wants to inspect who the other sniper is. it is no longer morbid curiosity to peer a useless frame up close. it is more corresponding to paying his respects to the opposite sniper. Plus, the sniper believes that there's a chance that he may recognise the enemy sniper.

He decided that he became a great shot, whoever he became. He puzzled did he understand him. possibly he were in his personal enterprise earlier than the break up in the military.

It seems that he does realize the man that he killed. it's his very own brother. The above information about the sniper's regret and choice to pay respects to the enemy combatant screen that the sniper is not a blood thirsty killing machine. he is doing his task for the conflict, but would not take delight in it. i might say that O'Flaherty presents the sniper as a focused guy and very human.

sorry but whats the question?

government played the key role in promoting industrialization in russia while individual businesses played a larger role in great britain. or for apex a