English, 17.04.2020 17:08 lilspike420

To be sure, he had heard the owl's screech for many and many a night; but he had seen no cause for fear in this: everything was going along nicely; their little son was in good health and they, too, knew no illness. But now the warning of the evil omen was confirmed. The pigeons which he had himself brought up were flying away. They were leaving, thus forecasting the arrival of death.
How does structuring the story to end with this paragraph affect the reader's perception of events?
A) The final paragraph complicates things because it makes the reader wonder if the man's perception of things is accurate.
B) The final paragraph is confusing because it signifies that the departure of the birds may not really be happening.
C) This final paragraph is powerful because it suddenly reveals the bad thing that could soon happen to the family.
D) The final paragraph is amusing, because it shows that folklore is bogus.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 05:30

24.1.6 quiz: william faulkner aperle question 4 of 5 2 points what is cash building in as i lay dying? o a. a truck bed for jewel o b. a bin to pile cotton in o c. a kitchen table for his family o d. a box to bury addie in subm

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 11:30

Read the excerpt from suffragists' "great demand" banner. in 1917, more than one thousand women stood before the white house in a cold, pouring rain, holding silent vigil to demand a constitutional amendment to extend the vote to them. their quest to be enfranchised by law was known at the time as the great demand. the smithsonian's great demand banner, as it came to be called, declares in bold words and style the determination of the women who made and carried it. their campaign on behalf of women sought to move america one step closer to fulfilling the nation's long-deferred promise of equality under the law. which statements about this excerpt are correct? check all that apply.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 16:30

Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. argument’s conclusion: governments should legally ban restaurants from offering toys as an incentive to families to buy food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium. counterargument: if the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium. rebuttal: even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it’s difficult to do so if restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. educating parents combined with regulating restaurants can families make healthier decisions. put the counterargument and rebuttal above into paragraph format. add signal words to properly guide the reader.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 17:00

Which is a sentence fragment? a. at the picnic table and chairs overlooking the water. b. pass the ketchup. c. it's going to be fun spending the week here. d. sherbet is a cool, refreshing dessert.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

To be sure, he had heard the owl's screech for many and many a night; but he had seen no cause for f...

Questions