Prompt: Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford’s final action in "The Most Dangerous Game” is justified.

Which could serve as claims for a paragraph written in response to the prompt? Check all that apply.

1. Rainsford’s final action in “The Most Dangerous Game” is justified because of
Zaroff’s actions.
2. Rainsford is forced to play what Zaroff calls the “most dangerous game,” to hunt—man.
3. By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in “The Most Dangerous Game.”
4. Rainsford has committed murder, which is not a game.
5. Murder is not something that can be justified

1st one:  Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified because of Zaroff's actions.

3rd one:  By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game."

Explanation:

gandhi had lead a successful campaign of nonviolent civil resistance to british rule, which led to india's independence. good luck

explanation:

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)