Should guns be banned in the public? Write an essay on the yes side or the no side ALSO, BRAINLIEST IS ON THE LINE, PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS! This essay has to have 1 introduction, 1 thesis, 3 body paragraphs with 3 examples, and 3 explanations, and 1 conclusion. Altogether the paragraph should have 5 paragraphs The introduction has to be 3-5 sentences, and general to specific. The body paragraphs have to be explained well in depth. The conclusion has to have 3-4 sentence, and specific to general.

see explanation

Explanation:

Since the ratification of the second amendment in 1791, citizens of the United States have been given the right to bear arms. To purchase a gun, buyers must go through a background check to ensure they are not a criminal. Most people have access to buying guns as the process is fairly simple. Guns should not be banned in public because they provide self defense, make the carrier feel safer, and most gun owners have gone through training to use the gun.  

To begin with, although background checks are in place before purchasing firearms, criminals could find ways to own a gun illegally. If a felon gets possession of a gun and enters a public place with malicious intentions, many people could be hurt and even killed. The police may be too far away to spare every life; however, if there is a good person in the area that is armed with a gun, they could use it and stop the situation before innocent people are killed.  

In addition, the owner of a firearm may feel safer knowing they can protect themselves and others. For example, if a bad situation were to occur, the gun bearer would feel much more at ease knowing that they could save themselves. When walking alone at night or entering a high risk area, a gun could be the difference between saving their own life or getting killed.  

Finally, the majority of gun owners go through a gun safety and training course. This is to ensure they know how to use a gun and so they do not make any deadly mistakes when handling one. Some may not have had professional training, but instead have had a friend or family member show them how to use a firearm. Either way, gun owners are aware of how to fire, reload, and overall handle the weapon.

In conclusion, guns should be allowed in public spaces because it makes the owner feel at ease, can save lives, and the gun owners are trained in using a gun. Feeling safe is important when in public. Guns are also used as a means of protection when in the right person’s hands. Most firearm owners have gone through some sort of training and know how to handle a gun. Guns are beneficial in public to save lives and should not be banned.  

the author is showing that it is the insatisfaction of basic needs that brings about the protests such as the strikes.if workers do not earn enough to buy food and feed their families and themselves in order to continue working, what is the use of working? besides, another message from the author is that of the owners of factories should be worried about ensuring their furure by having a second and third generation of workers in their industries.if they do not hear the workers demands, they will not have any more workers to make their pockets full.

umm we do not your answer or what you are talking about