subject
English, 25.09.2020 22:01 chaitanyac90

help STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt
By S. E. Forman

1911

THE MATCH

There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match.

Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.

In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.

Read this sentence from the text:

But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished.

How does this line show the problem with early fire?
It shows how dependable nature is.
It shows how people got fire.
It shows how long it took to create matches.
It shows the need for matches.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
What is the difference between theme and universal theme? theme refers to the central insight revealed through an american story, while universal theme refers to a theme revealed through a story of foreign origin. theme refers to a central message that applies to anyone, anywhere, while universal theme is particular to a certain individual, historical context, or culture. theme refers to the central insight revealed through a story, while universal theme refers to a theme that applies to anyone, anywhere. theme and universal theme are two terms that have the same definition.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 14:00
What grammatical structure is the italicized portion of the sentence by serving as a popcorn vendor down so many good games
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:00
Based on mark antony’s argument in the above speech, why does he repeat the line, “but brutus says he was ambitious,/and brutus is an honorable man”?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 18:00
Which best corrects the run-on sentence? the belt of orion has three bright stars in a row it is visible in the northern hemisphere. a. the belt of orion has three bright stars in a row, and it is visible in the northern hemisphere. b. the belt of orion has three bright stars in a row. in the northern hemisphere, it is visible. c. the belt of orion is visible in the northern hemisphere; has three bright stars in a row. d. the belt of orion has three bright stars in a row; visible in the northern hemisphere.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
help STORIES OF USEFUL INVENTIONS, excerpt
By S. E. Forman

1911

THE...
Questions
question
Biology, 26.08.2019 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722363