Use the drop down menus to analyze how this essay addresses the same topic as Bruchac's poem. How does Keeler's overall content differ from Bruchac's?

How does Keeler's general approach to the subject differ from Bruchac's?

How does Keeler's ending differ from Bruchac's?

1.Keeler deals mainly with the pilgrims while Bruchac discusses immigrants who came later.

2.Keeler uses an argument that appeals to facts and emotions.

3.Keeler looks towards the future while Bruchac looks at the past.

Explanation:

I did the assignment.

1.Keeler deals mainly with the pilgrims while Bruchac discusses immigrants who came later.

2.Keeler uses an argument that appeals to facts and emotions.

3.Keeler looks towards the future while Bruchac looks at the past.

Explanation:

the answer would be: it explains that at least one son must join the church

the expression ''as the tithe of his sons'' indicates how his father intended for at least one of his sons to serve the church. this phrase demonstrates that his father offered him as a last resort since none of his brothers chose to serve the church.

hope this answer you: )!