subject
English, 15.11.2020 22:50 officialrogerfp3gf2s

These are the same notes on ' conflict' that you saw in the previous page.

INTERNAL CONFLICT AND
EXTERNAL CONFLICT:

Internal Conflict is in the mind and heart. It's when you are conflicted about something
within yourself. Internal conflict does not have anything to do with anybody else except
yourself

External Conflict is a conflict that takes places with somebody or something OUTSIDE of
yourself. For example, a conflict with a classmate; a
conflict with a neighbor.

In literature, keep in mind, external conflict can take place between a character and another
character, a character vs. nature, or a character vs. society. That is external
conflict.

In Julius Caesar, pay close attention to the conflicts that take place within the characters
(Brutus, Cassius, Murullus, Flavius, Caesar, Casca, etc.). Pay attention to how people use
other people, jealousy, envy, and strife. This is what contributes to or represents conflict
throughout the story

Question 1

What are two conflicts that we can see already in the play? Who is involved? Are
they internal or external? Explain these conflicts in as much detail as possible.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:50
In the monkey king plotline of american born chinese, why is tze-yo-tzuh the antagonist?
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
You have been given an assignment to speak on the federal prison system in the u.s. which of the following sources is likely to be the least credible? a. an interview with an inmate of a federal prison b. the us department of justice “federal bureau of prisons” website: c. the website [] which discusses the danger of releasing an alarming number of convicts back into society d. an article from foxnews.com about the florida state penitentiary
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 19:00
Based on the evidence provided, readers can conclude that trey is
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Read the excerpt from a supporting opinion of the supreme court’s ruling in plessy v. ferguson, 1896. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
These are the same notes on ' conflict' that you saw in the previous page.

INTERNAL CON...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360