Why do reviews often begin with an objective summary of the material being reviewed? A. So the reviewer can prove that he or she is not biased toward the material

B. So the reviewer can establish whether or not he or she liked the material

C. So the audience can better understand the later criticism of the material

D. So the readers know where they can go to find more information

Reviews begin with an objective summary so that the public can better understand the post-criticism of the material, as shown in option C.

We can arrive at this answer because:

Thus, we can state that the objective summary introduces the reader to the work and prepares the reader for future information.

More information:

link

how much wood did the woodchuck chuck since a wood chuck can chuck wood.

xd

btw woodchucks cant chuck wood.

brainliest ?