Keisha is writing a research paper on the dangers of distracted driving for her social studies class. She is allowed to use two websites for her sources but one must provide factual data and research information. She
finds a website set up by a mother whose son was killed in a car accident by another driver who was texting
and driving. Keisha locates the author's name on the website, and the site looks professional. However, the
mother not only calls the other driver names, but also says that the other driver's parents did not raise him
right.

Plz help me I am timed plz
Should she use this website as a source of factual evidence? Why?

A. Yes, she should use the site because it will be a good resource against the distracted driver
argument.

В. No, she should not use the site because people who have been directly affected by something
are too close to it to be objective and offer neutral facts.

C. No, she should look for a website that focuses on the facts and data surrounding this issue as
her fact resource. She may choose to use other information from this site for other aspects of
her paper.

D. Yes, she should use the site because it is a credible resource. Distracted drivers are terrible
people, and they need to be stopped!