CAN SOMEONE PLEASE WRITE A CONCLUSION TO THIS PASSAGE. ILL GIVE OUT BRAINIEST. Joe Biden has been very busy since day one. He signed many orders about coronavirus, lgbtq+ rights, immigration, and so on. Biden is trying to make everything better again by changing everything Trump did in the past. I believe Donald Trump could’ve done a better job, but just decided not to.
One thing that Biden wrote about was climate change. Climate change is something that has been happening for a while now, and it's hurting animal habitats, and our environment. Biden decided to bring back the Paris Climate Accord back because Trump didn’t really think that this is a thing to pay attention to, so he got rid of the organization. I think this is a good thing that's happening, because this can really help our environment.
Another thing that Biden did was now when you want to travel or go somewhere you are required to wear masks. Biden is also trying to get as many people vaccinated as he can, so other people won’t be affected with this virus. This is a good idea because it can lower the chances of other people getting the virus, and can maybe stop the virus from spreading even more.
Many people lost their jobs due to the virus, so Biden wrote in the executive order that people won’t be getting evicted from their houses. The way I see things, this is a fair thing to do. Like I said before people lost their jobs due to the virus, so they don't have a job to pay their rents. Since Biden said people won’t be getting evicted from their houses, it's giving people time to get the money.

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

Whenever we take information from another source – whether we use the information word for word or we put the information into our own words – we must use a(n) right after where the research occurs in the paper.

My cat and my dog like best friends