Read a text about thundersnow. Thunderstorms of snow are so unusual that many people don't realize they exist or how dangerous they are. When it comes to lightning risk, a thunderstorm of snow, or thundersnow, is no different from a thunderstorm of rain. Thunder signifies the presence of lightning, so even if you don't see any lightning flashes, it's crucial to seek safe shelter in order to avoid being struck. In addition, thundersnow often involves heavy snowfall and enormous ice pellets, creating even more safety risks. While you may be tempted to grab your camera and explore this otherworldly winter wonderland, the safest thing to do during thundersnow is to remain indoors. Select the three details that are included in the text.

First, you have to find the main idea (Which is "Thundersnow is dangerous")

Then, you have to find the supporting details, which is what the question is asking for

I believe these are the details:

-When it comes to lightning risk, a thunderstorm of snow, or thundersnow, is no different from a thunderstorm of rain.

-Thunder signifies the presence of lightning, so even if you don't see any lightning flashes, it's crucial to seek safe shelter in order to avoid being struck.

-In addition, thundersnow often involves heavy snowfall and enormous ice pellets, creating even more safety risks

I hope this helps and is correct! Good luck!

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.

b. our party quickly made its way into the cave / but we failed to find our host [the cyclops] himself inside.