PLEASE HELP. Which Supreme Court Decision upheld the FCC’s right to mandate decency standards?

FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc.

FCC v. Fox Television Stations

FCC v. Pacifica Foundation

FCC v. AT&T, Inc.

FCC v. Pacifica Foundation

Explanation:

In 1973, a compliant was filed with the FCC by a man who had heard some bad language on the radio as he rode with his son. He filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to say that minors should not have to listen to such words on broadcast media and the FCC agreed.

It became a law suit that made it all the way to the Supreme Court in 1978 and ended up with the Supreme Court ruling that the FCC had the implied Constitutional power to regulate indecent speech which upheld the FCC’s right to mandate decency standards.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

in the sonnet 116 written by william shakespeare we can analyze the symbolism and say that he reuses the idea of love like a guiding star for the sailor.

reading through the poem we find out that in the line 7 there is a metaphor for the lover that is heading through the life events by love itself .