History, 26.06.2019 06:30 mikee675

This may be more of an opinion is it more important for an individual to do what is "politically correct" or to do what is morally right even if it upsets people? is it different for a president?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: milkshakegrande101

Explanation:

I have a story that my wife (an American) told me. She was horrified to learn that Bill Clinton sends a gift to Monica on important occasions. I was not. Bill is thumbing his nose at the conventions of society and perhaps he and Monica became good friends. I think, in recognizing her friendship, he is doing the right thing. Friendship is very rare. The politically correct thing to do was never see her again. My wife has a secondary point about this for which I have no answer, he is hurting both his daughter and wife.

FDR was married to Elinor. He could not have served as president for as long as he did without her help. And yet, he had other women pass through his personal life because they fulfilled what Elinor -- the mother of 5 of his children -- could not. It wasn't sexual either. It was just that he needed female companionship and compassion (which was not delivered in the form of pity.)

So to answer your question, the press in a way is at fault. If you want to destroy someone, the way to do it is with sex. Every adult understands sex and the taboos that go along with it. The press decided not to do anything about FDR (the right thing) and they decided to crucify Bill (the Politically correct thing). Surely there is more important news to report that doesn't involve intrusion into an ex-president's life.

My own feeling is you do the right thing. You will be admired for it. To practice the politically correct thing just avoids detection.

Answer from: Quest

the correct answer is: " 3.6 % " .

→ the unemployment rate is: " 3.6 % " .

explanation:

to calculate the "unemployment rate" :

the "unemployment rate" =

[# of people unemployed] / [working age population] * 100 % ;

= [9 million] / [250 million] * 100 % ;

→ note: the units of "million" cancel out;

since: " {million} / {million} = 1 " ;

= (9 / 250) * 100 % ;

= 0.036 * 100 % ;

= 3.6 %

answer: the unemployment rate is: " 3.6 % " .

Answer from: Quest

sharecropper (you may punch em in the face if im wrong lol)

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 13:30

Iwant to be an engineer but cant do math for the life of me, but i also want to be a cop. "what should i do"

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 19:00

(1) which of these statements best describes the views of nativists in the late 1800s? a)they believed that immigrants were inferior to individuals born in the united states. b)they believed that more people should immigrate to the united states and assimilate into american culture. c)they believed that no one should be allowed to immigrate to the united states. d)they believed that immigrants had a responsibility to bring their own cultures to the united states. (2)which of the following best describes tenements in new york city in the early 1900s? a) crowded and unsanitary apartment buildings where two-thirds of the city's population lived b) crowded and unsanitary apartment buildings where a small portion of the city's population lived c) dark and crowded homes outside the city where the majority of city workers lived d) dark and crowded homes outside the city where immigrants lived for a short time after arriving in america 3) during the 1800s, nativists promoted the idea that immigrants contributed to unemployment a) taking jobs back to their native countries. b) blocking american workers from applying for jobs. c) competing for jobs that they believed should go to people born in america. d) forcing or intimidating employers into hiring them. 4) which law required immigrants to be able to read and write? a) the chinese exclusion act b) the immigration act of 1917 c) the emergency quota act d) the johnson-reed immigration act

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 04:00

Enter the word you receive when you completed the river valley civilizations activity

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 04:30

Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fill the throne, as reigning monarchs. shall they who are thought worthy of the highest station, in hereditary monarchies, be deemed unworthy of election to office, by the suffrages of a free people? if women, placed in the administration of great and vast national affairs, by the mere accident of birth, have acted wisely, much more might we expect not wisdom only, but integrity in the government of women, selected by free citizens, with a view to mental and moral fitness. short-answer questions where did henry amringe make these comments? what argument does amringe give to support his views?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

This may be more of an opinion is it more important for an individual to do what is "politically co...

Questions