Use the excerpt from huey p. long's "share our wealth" speech, given on march 12, 1935, to answer the question.

and they proceeded with the nra. everything from a peanut stand to a powerhouse had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. if a peanut stand started to parch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. one slip and he went to jail. a little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule book. so they wrote their nra rule book, codes, laws, etc. they got up over 900 of them. one would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. it would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail.

in 3–5 sentences, analyze huey long’s criticism of the new deal. cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis.

wealthy plebeians became part of the roman nobility. however, despite changes in the laws, the patricians always held a majority of the wealth and power in ancient rome. a third social class in roman society was the slaves. around one third of the people living in rome were slaves.

hope this

it further strained relations between the north and the south and convinced

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho