subject
History, 25.02.2020 21:58 marykayy0218own5cp

Many historians have argued that by the late nineteenth century the industrialized nations of Europe had achieved global economic dominance more through force and coercion than through the superiority of their industrial products. Which of the following nineteenth-century developments would best support this contention? A) The growth of South American agricultural exports. B) The abolition of slavery in the Americas. C) The growth of industrial production in North America. D) The decline of the Indian textile industry's share of global manufacturing.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Why did some people support supply-side economics and others opposed it? it addressed the supply of goods and ignore demand. it called for large tax cuts for the wealthy. forigen production played a significant role in the plan. the program called for increased government spending.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
The original term of was descriptive of lower-class people who performed manual labor.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:00
When gandhi reached the arabian sea at the end of the salt march, he picked up raw salt from the water and made a declaration: “with this, i am shaking the foundations of the british empire.” how do you think this quotation is symbolic of gandhi’s works and philosophy?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
The government gives public funds to low-performing schools for new computers. they decide to give more money to the lowest performers, some of which happen to promote multi denominational religions. according to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government's action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Many historians have argued that by the late nineteenth century the industrialized nations of Europe...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 21:32
Questions on the website: 13722361