The First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech was a right that was severely tested during the American Civil War. In the North, opposition to conscription, emancipation, or any other war measures intended to aid the Union cause became a punishable offense because the wartime government considered dissent to be harmful to the war effort. Newspaper men in the South who were outspoken about opposing the war with the North were threatened, murdered, or run out of town by citizens and the Confederacy. Do you feel that the Southern newspaper men and others should have been permitted to say and write things publicly against the war? Should free speech against the government be permitted during times of war? Explain your answer.

yes

Explanation:

it should be permitted, because when the amendment says freedom of speech, that means, freedom of speech no matter what. even at times of war that amendment isn't just removed for the time of war. that amendment is still in tact as long as its apart of the bill of rights.

music always has an important role in culture and societies, infact for example rock’n roll music has conditioned different areas of pop culture above all in the 60s. in the modern american society its role is different.

unfortunately many think about how some unfortunate events happened to the columbine high school shootings can be related to rock music just because the teenagers involved listened to this kind of music.

i think that we can valorize the change to take refuge in this genre of music to keep on in everyday life, teenagers are comfortable when they can listen to a song about a specific problem. realizing that someone else is living your personal drama too can them to feel less lonely nowadays.

he was in office from 1929 to 1933 and served as a reform governor, promoting programs to combat the economic crisis besetting the united states at the time. in the 1932 presidential election, roosevelt defeated republican president herbert hoover in a landslide.

explanation: