According to humanist thinkers, political decisions should be based on ancient wisdom.
rational thought.
religious doctrines.
artistic inclinations.

According to humanist thinkers, decisions of a political nature should be made based on rational thought.

According to humanism:

When it comes to politics, this applies as well. They believed that decisions of governance should be made based on what will apply best to the society and not what religion believes. It was this thinking that led to the Renaissance.

In conclusion, Humanists believe that decisions should follow a rational process.

Find out more at link.

rational thought.

Explanation:

The humanistic philosophy was based on the positioning of the human being as the center of the world, being the most influential and important being capable of making great contributions to humanity through his dignity, quality, capacity, aspirations and mainly through the rationality that is what differentiates humans from other animals and what makes it so special.

With that, we can say that according to humanist thinkers, political decisions must be based on rational thinking.

according to romans 13: 1-7, 1st peter 2: 12-14, and 1 timothy 2: 1-4, christians as citizens have specific responsibilities to a nation that gives liberties to its people. christians are obliged to live as good citizens by submitting to the human government. honor, or respect, is due to men in the high governmental station. a christian should reflect such respect not to gain some favor but because it is god’s will. peter 2: 14 notes that the purpose of the human government is to promote peace and justice in society. to submit to human government, peter includes three elements; obedience, respect, and good deeds.

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.  

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.  

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.  

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)  

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei     hope this i had some from the internet u   can report me if u want