How did the debate over incorporating independent Texas into the United States show both the embrace and skepticism of those principles?

Answer and Explanation:

The discussion about the incorporation of Texas into the USA may present a strong acceptance of the principles of territorial extension and imperialism. This is because these principles defend the dominance of the USA over independent states, as a way to increase their power and influence in the world. Texas, as a region, independent of Mexico, accepted this type of domination, which raises American morality and establishes the country as something promising, powerful and admirable.

However, many people may be skeptical of this and claim that these principles promote the suppression of cultures, in addition to promoting unnecessary economic expenditure that presents more disadvantages to the United States than advantages. An example of this was the possible war between Mexico and the USA due to this indexation. This war promotes exorbitant cats that could be used to strengthen the United States.

affirmative action refers to the policies that take gender, race, or ethnicity into account in order to promote equal opportunity.

employers subject to title vii are prohibited from taking race or sex into account in any employment decisions. aa is a penalty for having any job group substantially statistically "underutilized" in any race or either sex. the employer must take steps to eliminate the underutilization, then stop, ending its aa efforts

the right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.  " the  participant in european imperialism is being described below is that  their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.