Jackson compares the forced removal of Native Americans to the experiences of freedom-seeking early European settlers in the Thirteen Colonies. Is this a fair comparison? Why or why not?

The comparison is somewhat fair.

Explanation:

Freedom-seeking early Europeans went to the Thirteen Colonies in many cases because they were persecuted in Europe. This is the case for the Puritans in New England, the Hugenots and Quakers in Pennsylvania, or the German Amish and Mennonites, also in Pennsylvania.

However, they were not always obliged to abandon their homelands in the same brutal manner that the Native Americans were during the forced removal.

So the comparison is not completely unfair, but is not fully accurate either.

the correct answer is =   british soldiers attacked and killed five boston townspeople.

world war i began in 1914, after the assassination of archduke franz ferdinand, and lasted until 1918. during the conflict, germany, austria-hungary, bulgaria and the ottoman empire (the central powers) fought against great britain, france, russia, italy, romania, japan and the united states (the allied powers). to new military technologies and the horrors of trench warfare, world war i saw unprecedented levels of carnage and destruction. by the time the war was over and the allied powers claimed victory, more than 16 million people—soldiers and civilians alike—were dead.

explanation: