What writer’s novels were based on the themes of social injustice and inhumanity?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not specify if you are referring to international literature, Europe, or America, we are going to assume that you are referring to the United States.

However, trying to help you with a good answer to this general question, we can say the following.

The writer’s novel that was based on the themes of social injustice and inhumanity is "Uncle Tom's Cabin," written by Harriet Beecher Stowe in 1852. This American author analyzed and critiqued the institution of slavery in the southern states, where African slaves were exploited working for long hours under the sun, growing the crops that had to be traded and exported to Europe.

Beecher's novel created a huge impact in the American society of the North, strengthening the demand for the abolition of slavery, and some historians say that "Uncle's Tom Cabin," accelerated the beginning of the American Civil War.

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

hope this : )

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is