Una mujer gestante descubre, mediante una prueba diagnóstica, que el hijo que espera es un deficiente mental. Se le presenta el dilema de interrumpir o no su embarazo. Su médico le instruye

que, si lo desea, puede abortar sin impedimentos clínicos de ninguna clase. Pero un sacerdote

pretende convencerla para que rechace decididamente esta posibilidad. La mujer permanece

perpleja ante la diversidad de criterio de las fuentes consultadas. Religión, ciencia y hasta legalidad

civil (si demora demasiado su decisión, infringirá el plazo legal para abortar) le ofrecen, cada una por

su lado, criterios encontrados sobre la licitud moral del propósito de imp edir aquel nacimiento. Pues

bien, si ella obrase en conformidad con cualquiera de estas fuentes, pero sin haber reflexionado

antes, a su propio y pe rsonal criterio, sobre la conveniencia de su acción, tendríamos que decir que

ha decidido según una voluntad heterónoma. Literalmente, según una ley o disposición ajenas. Si,

por lo contrario, cualquiera que haya sido su opción, ha atendido previamente a lo que disponen su

razón y su conciencia, esta mujer habrá decidido según un querer autónomo, es decir, según una

voluntad no predeterminada por disposiciones diferentes a las de su propia ley o autonomía.

me pueden ayudar con esta pregunta

a. Describo con mis palabras la situación que se presentó
​

a.  

women in ancient egypt had many legal rights, including the right to own property and businesses.

answer; the period of time known as the middle ages;

im not sure its either a leader of a group of congresspeople or a person from a congressmans district

sorry im not sure

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)