Which answer best explains the Cherokee's main argument against Georgia in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia? A. The Cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes.
B. The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.
C. The Cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government.
D. The Cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so Georgia had no case.

The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.

Explanation:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, it was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Cherokee Nation applied for a federal court order against the laws passed by the State of Georgia of the United States. UU That deprived them of rights within their limits, but the Supreme Court did not hear the case on its merits. It was ruled that he had no original jurisdiction in the matter, since the Cherokees were a dependent nation, with a relationship to the United States as that of a "ward to his guardian," as Judge Marshall said

the ss was the main organization responsible for the genocidal murder of around six million people of european ethnic minorities, essentially jews, in the holocaust. the members of all its branches committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during the second world war (1939-1945). likewise, the ss were involved in commercial enterprises and exploited the inmates of the concentration camps as slave laborers.

the tortures and assassinations committed by the ss were the result of an ideology developed long before the armed conflict, this ideology was based on the racial supremacy of the germans over the rest.

a phrase from a poem by ralph waldo emerson about the battle of lexington and concord. emerson's words read, “here once the embattled farmers stood / and fired the shot heard round the world.”