subject
History, 05.10.2019 16:00 adamgala3885

What was the federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution?
it might be used later to limit rights that weren’t originally listed.
it was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms.
it was unnecessary because the new government had limited power.
it might be used later to free enslaved people in the west.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:00
Read the sentences from walden by henry david thoreau. the greater part of what my neighbors call good i believe in my soul to be bad, and if i repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior. what demon possessed me that i behaved so well? which option most effectively explains the meaning of the figure of speech used in this excerpt? thoreau feels out of place in the company of others. thoreau is happiest in the company of others. thoreau regrets conforming to the expectations of others. thoreau enjoys ridiculing the opinions of others.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 15:00
For which two reasons did the iroquois confederacy eventually side with the british?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
Brainliesttt !me : ) what was the result of indian independence?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
What was the primary purpose of the sibley commission in georgia? to schools across georgia integrate peacefully to discover how georgians felt about the issue of integration to lead non-violent protests to elect new civil rights leaders
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What was the federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution?
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.11.2020 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722359