subject
History, 25.07.2019 15:30 jfrjtwrg

In what case was it determined that the president cannot use his commander in chief status to seize domestic property during war in a foreign land? a. youngstown sheet and tube co. v. sawyer b. jones v. clinton c. united states v. nixon d. brown v. board of education e. hamdi v. rumsfeld

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:20
What argument is susan b. anthony making in the passage? a. male citizens created the laws to secure the rights of men, so legal reform is required to secure women’s rights. b. women are often punished for committing criminal acts that are pardoned when committed by men. c. women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males. d. the court judge modified the original documents to arrest and try anthony unfairly.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:50
Why did the meiji reformers want to modernize japan a) to colonize weaker nations in south east asia b) to allow western nations to protect them and treat negotiation c) to compete with the economics and military of western nations d) to replace additional prices with weston culture
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Which of the choices below best describes columbus initial interaction with taino people
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Who was the leader of the democratic people’s republic at the beginning of the korean war?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In what case was it determined that the president cannot use his commander in chief status to seize...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 06:01
Questions on the website: 13722362